Cannibalism! Well sort of...

Tom's Voice is Better

As the title suggests, I think I’ve reached the cannibalism part of the novel. Unfortunately, it was rather anticlimactic, as I was expecting for the man to be actually captured by cannibals. Then, as he woke from a daze he would be like, “Oh hey what’s going on?” And the cannibals would turn to him, whilst eating something, and they wouldn’t reply. Then he would realize that they were eating his leg and it would be a clever twist. Actually, I stole that from The Walking Dead, but I was nearly positive that’s how the cannibalism would of went down. I’m not completely sure how the boy would factor in though.
Instead, The Road disappointed me once again. Now, to be fair, there could be more cannibalism on the way, but, nevertheless, it was quite anticlimactic. Basically, both of our characters are exploring this home and they find this hatch in the middle of the floor. Despite the boy advising that they should leave, the man opens up the hatch and goes down the stairs. Then, there’s just a large amount of random naked people running around. Well, crawling actually. One guy was lying on a bed and didn’t even have any legs, so that’s certainly a tough time. It’s revealed, later in the novel, that the people keeping those people down there were cannibals.
Yeah, so that was a splendid read.
Anyway, in this blog post I wanted to talk about our main characters. We have two characters in our book: a father and his son. They are travelling to the South to beat the snow in a post-apocalyptic world. We follow these two characters through a third-person omniscient narrator that occasionally shifts to first person. Completely randomly in fact.
So most of our time is spent describing the actions of the man. Considering this, we have a great deal of time to learn some interesting things about him. What’s especially evident, for the majority of the reading so far, is that the man is very compassionate towards his son. Everything he does is to ensure his protection, and he even tells the boy at one point, “My job is to take care of you. I was appointed to do that by God,” (McCarthy 70). And the man’s struggle with religion is something that returns time and time again in the novel. At the beginning of the novel he curses at God, which I suppose is justified, considering the scorched earth and stuff.
Another time, he is telling his son that he has to kill himself if the men see him: “When the time comes there will be no time. Now is the time. Curse God and die,” (McCarthy 120). The man’s belief in a higher power, despite hardship, shows that he is persistent in believing in a benevolent power. This could be an important aspect of his character, but at the same time I don’t think there are many religious people that randomly decide to radically change their views in times of hardship, so maybe this point is only minor.
And this idea of the father taking care of his son is not only seen in more important scenes, but also in these small displays of compassion. For instance, a man straight tries taking the boy hostage in one scene and the father murders him. Afterwards, he scoops the boy up, and carries him away: “He wiped the blood from his face and held him. It's okay, he said. It's okay,” (McCarthy 61). The man constantly has to calm the boy down in scenes involving emotional distress. He clearly cares deeply about his son’s survival, and it’s probably the only thing keeping him going. The man shows his compassion to his son in little ways too: giving him a coke, carrying him when he’s tired, and leaving the lamp on to keep him warm.
More importantly, the man is aware of when he is crossing a line. In a scene where the boy thinks he spots another kid, the man calms himself despite a tense situation: “ Do you want to die? Is that what you want? I don't care, the boy said, sobbing. I don't care. The man stopped. He stopped and squatted and held him. I'm sorry, he said. Don't say that,” (McCarthy 79).
A little bit on the son here. He’s not a particularly complex character, considering how young he is. However, what is evident is a compassion for helping other people. At some points this transcends the boundaries of being naive. Every character the boy meets he wants to help. Whether it’s the kid that he sees in the woods, the man struck by lightning, or the random naked people they find that are probably going to be eaten, the boy asks his father if they can help them, or at least is particularly silent after an emotional scene with death.  The boy is naive however in  suggesting that they can help the man that was struck by lightning, or offering nonexistent food to a boy he’d just met: “And I'd give that little boy half of my food,” (McCarthy 79).
One center of tension between our two main characters is surrounding death. Tension was clearly visible between our two characters in the scene with the mysterious boy. When asked if he wanted to the die the boy replied that “[He] didn’t care.” This clearly struck a nerve for the father, not only because he does everything in his power to ensure his son's survival, but also because that type of talk might resemble the man’s relationship with his wife.
In a dream the man had we see harsh dialogue being exchanged between the man and his wife: “What in God's name are you talking about? We're not survivors. We're the walking dead in a horror film,” (McCarthy 48). The idea is that his wife was tired of surviving in this post-apocalyptic world, and there’s no desire for protecting her son because she knows the cruelty of this new world. She didn’t value her survival any longer, and this is paralleled, in part, by the son’s dialogue in the scene with the boy. This theme of giving up when times are rough is of particular emotional value to the man, but he is still able to control himself, and shift his tone to calming down the boy, rather than yelling.
Overall, I predict the idea of giving up due to the constant mandate that the setting facilitates as a major conflict for the remainder of the novel. Possibly, even the climax of the novel itself. Who knows, we’ll have to find out. Also, Tom's better.

Comments

  1. It's good to see that you are settling into this audio book narrator. What do you think the switch between points of view suggests? Is there any distinct changes in tone between the two points of view? Also, pertaining to the father's uncertainty with religion, is there any kind of Noah's Ark-style symbolism or other meaning that this religious struggle has beyond the father's immediate emotions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a quality question you have there. It's only happened a couple of times, but I definitely noticed a tone shift. Tom's soothing voice made it difficult to notice, but the tone changed to a bitter, matter-of-fact tone. The man was discussing how a dog that was following them had disappeared, and the tone was quite bitter. This probably used to characterize the man's interpretation of the post-apocalyptic world as matter-of-fact.

      In terms of the father's struggle with religion, I think that there is some evidence to suggest some other meaning. Specifically, I think it relates to a more general theme about hope, and how fragile it can be in the face of hardship. As far as Noah's Ark-style symbolism, I'm not sure what you mean.

      Delete
  2. I thought you did a very nice job describing your characters and including a variety of helpful quotes from the novel. I also really enjoyed the humor that you included at the beginning of your post. It was a good hook and made me want to keep reading.

    I noticed that you said that the point of view switches around randomly, and I was wondering what you think of that. Does it bother you at all when it switches? Do you think that there is a reason for the change? Also, you said that the son’s survival seems like the only reason for the father to keep going. If the father did not have his son do you think he would just give up?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, I thought the humor was helping. I dialed down on the humor this time, but I'm glad to know someone appreciated it.

      In terms of the point of view switches, I think the changes in point of view, although rare, provide some necessary characterization. When the point of view changed in the scene with the dog, the tone changed highlighted the matter-of-fact attitude of "the man." I think the point of view changes are definitely necessary due to the objective tone that the third-person narration provides.

      And yes, I think that if the father did not have his son he would give up. His sole purpose in the novel, in my opinion, is to protect his son, and considering he lost his wife at some point after the apocalypse, I don't think there's much keeping him going.

      Delete
  3. I agree that the fight against giving up, despite the horrible circumstances, is definitely a critical component of the novel. The man does pretty much everything in order to protect his son, but when faced by being discovered by the cannibals, he thinks about killing him to prevent his suffering (rather than, say, fight the cannibals). I guess it just goes to show that everybody draws the line where survival just isn’t worth it anymore. Are you predicting that the father will be forced to cross this line again? Or that his son will give up? Just curious.
    Glad your narrator is getting better and great reads into the characters.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Noah, I always enjoy reading your blogs because I find them very fun. I think you do a fantastic job of analyzing situations and explain character motives. With that being said I am uncertain, based on your explanation of the boy, if he is being unreasonably naive. Is it odd for a child who has a seemingly morally responsible upbringing to have the desire to help others despite his own hardships?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, I really appreciate the positive feedback. And yeah I completely agree, I had trouble thinking of examples of him being unreasonably naive. I remember getting that impression of the novel, and so I tried to defend it in my post. I think the naive tendencies were more evident in the prior chapter in terms of his fear towards the house and his perceived ability to help someone struck by lightning. But I understand your point, it's pretty normal for a child of such a young age, in such a tough situation, to want to salvage hope for others.

      Delete
  5. Noah, you mention early in your post that the book disappointed you again. Since you've read McCarthy before, I wonder what is disappointing to you about this book. It would be interesting to hear a comparison of the two books at some point.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking in Nadsat May Make People Look at You Weird

Method Behind His Madness? No Actually.

Sociopaths on my Reading List